| 
					
					
					 Granite OIL Reservoir --
					FRACTURES AND POROUS Most people forget that there are many unconventional reservoirs
                in the world, including igneous, metamorphic, and volcanic rocks.
                Granite reservoirs are prolific in Viet Nam, Libya, and Indonesia.
                Lesser known granite reservoirs exist in Venezuela, United States,
                Russia, and elsewhere. Indonesia is blessed with a combination
                sedimentary, metamorphic, and granite reservoir with a single
                gas leg. Japan boasts a variety of volcanic reservoirs.
 This
			example is from the Bach Ho (White Tiger) Field in Viet Nam. Log
                analysis in these reservoirs requires good geological input as
                to mineralogy, oil or gas shows, and porosity. A good coring and
                sample description program is essential, and production tests
                are essential. The analyst often has to separate ineffective
                (disconnected vugs) from effective porosity and account for fracture
                porosity and permeability. All the usual mineral identification
                crossplots are useful but the mineral mix may be very different
                than normal reservoirs. Many such reservoirs seem to have no water
                zone and most have unusual electrical properties (A, M, N), so
                capillary pressure data is usually needed to calibrate water saturation.
                 
				  Ternary Diagram for Granite.         In
                the example below, the mineral assemblage was defined by the ternary
                diagram at right. The three minerals (quartz, feldspar,
                and plagioclase) were computed from a modified Mlith vs Nlith
                model, in which PE was substituted for PHIN in the Nlith equation.
                If data fell too far outside the triangle, mica was exchanged
                for the quartz.  Three
                rock types, granite, diorite, and monzonite, were derived from
                the three minerals. A trigger was set to detect basalt intrusions.
                A sample crossplot shows how the lithology model effectively separates
                the minerals. 
				 Mlith vs Plith crossplot for granite (micaceous
                data excluded)
 A
                sample of the log analysis plot is shown below. The average porosity
                from core and logs is only 0.018 (1.8%) and matrix permeability
                is only 0.05 md. However, solution porosity related to fractures
                can reach 17% and permeability can easily reach higher than several
                Darcies. Customized formulae were devised to estimate these properties
                from logs, based on core and test data. My colleague Bill Clow
                devised most of the methods used on this project. 
				 
   Depth plot for a granite reservoir
   Note
                the fracture porosity and permeability derived from open hole
                log data. Fracture porosity from resistivity micro scanner logs
                was also computed where available to help control the open hole
                work. A black and white resistivity image log shows
                some of the fractures. Both high and low angle fractures co-exist. 
				 Resistivity micro scanner image in granite reservoir
 It
                is clear that non-conventional reservoirs may need some extra
                effort, customized models, and unique presentations. Everything
                you need to develop these techniques can be found elsewhere in this Handbook.
				The mineral properties need to be chosen carefully, but the
				mathematical models don't change too much.   
					
			 METAMORPHIC SAND Granite Reservoir -- Imdonesia Here
                is a granite/metamorphic example from Indonesia. In this case, the mineralogy
                was triggered by quantitative sample descriptions, which in turn
                were keyed to raw log response to minimize cavings and depth control
                issues.
   
				 Metamorphic / Granite example with quantitative sample
				description, calculates lithology, log analysis
 porosity, saturation, and saturation, with core porosity and permeability
				overlay. A production log cumulative productivity curve was
				overlaid as well on a similar curve generated from log analysis
				flow capacity (KH). Since this is a gas play, cutoffs are quite
				liberal.
 Quantitative
                sample description of mineral composition is shown in track five
                (right-hand track). Interpreted lithology is in track four; computed
                porosity in track three (middle track). The log analysis porosity
                matches core reasonably well (center track) and open hole fracture
                indicators (right edge of track one) correspond to resistivity
                image log data (left edge of track two).
 |