| 
					
					
					 Permeability from the
					LUCIA Method This is one of the
					newer permeability methods, designed especially for handling
					varying pore geometry in carbonates. It was proposed by
					Jennings and Lucia in "Predicting Permeability from Well
					Logs in Carbonates", SPE 2003. It is based on a concept
					called the Rock Fabric Number (RFN) based on the porosity -
					water saturation relationship in carbonates. Thc Wyllie-Rose
					method handles the pore geometry problem by using the
					irreducible water saturation in the denominaror of their
					equation. The RFN is more explicit.
 
 The relationship between RFN with porosity and saturation,
					and with permeability and porosity, are shown in the two
					graphs below.
 
					
			 
					
			 
 
			<== Higher water saturation for a given porosity gives higher RFN.
			Lower permeability for a given porosity gives higher RFN..         
  Rock
			Fabric Number from Lucia Method The Lucia
			method relies on a measure of inter-grain porosity, often callled
			connected porosity, excluding isolated, vuggy, or moldic porosity.
			This often considered to be:
 1: PHIg = PHIe - PHIsec
 
 Rock Fabric Number (RFN) is derived from:
 2: RFN = exp ((7.163 + 1.883 * ln(PHIg) +
			ln(SWir) ) / (3.063 + 0.610 * ln(PHIg))
 
 
 Where:
 PHIg = inter-grain porosity (fractional)
 PHIe = shale corrected porosity from density neutron logs (fractional_
 PHIsec = secondary porosity index (SPI) (fractional)
 Sw = water saturation (fractional)
 RFN = rock fabric number (unitless)
 
 SPL is often assumed to be PHIxdn minus PHIsc, where PHIxdn is shale
			corrected density neutron crossplat porosity and PHIsc is shale
			corrected sonic porosity. It may also be assumed to be a constant, a
			constant
 
 
 
  Permeability from
			Lucia Method 3: PERMrfn = exp((27.56 - 12.08 * ln(RFN)) +
			((8.671 - 3.603 * ln(RFN)) * ln(PHIg)))
 
 Where:
 PERMrfn = permeability (mD)
 
					
					 COMMENTS: You
			can estimate RFN based on sample descriptions instead of calculating
			it based on equations 1 and 2. Or use RFN as a calibrating parameter
			to match core data.
 
 
  RECOMMENDED
                PARAMETERS: None required.
 
 
  NUMERICAL
                EXAMPLE: SWir = Sw
			= 0.20
 PHIg = 0.20
 
 RFN = exp((7.163 + 1.883 * ln(0.20) + ln(0.20) ) / (3.036 + 0.61 *
			ln(0.20))) = 3.36
 PERMrfn = exp((27.56 - 12.08 * ln(3.36)) + ((8.671 - 3.603 *
			ln(3.36)) * ln(0.20))) = 400 mD
 
 
  META/LOG "PERM"  Compare
				Permeability Calculated from Various Methods 
 Download this spreadsheet:
 SPR-24 META/LOG PERMEABILITY CALCULATOR
 Calculate and compare permeability derived from well
			logs,
						5 Methods.
 
 |