| 
					
					
					 PERMEABILITY 
					from Dumanoir and Coates The
					original model is somewhat complicated and not very accurate
					in water bearing zones due to a number of assumptions that
					need to be made. The simplofied model is popular because it
					treats the porosity in the same way as the dual-water
					saturation model. Both total and effective porosity are
					used, so there is an implicit shale correction to the
					permeability calculation.
 
			First
                find the resistivity log reading in the irreducible water zone:1: IF Sw > 0.70
 2: THEN SWir = KBUCKL / PHIe
 3: AND RESir = A * RW@FT / (PHIe ^ M) / (SWir ^ N)
 4: OTHERWISE RESir = RESD
 Then
                calculate the porosity exponent (LPERM)5: LPERM = (3.75 - PHIe + ((log (RW@FT / RESir) + 2.2) ^ 2) /
                2) ^ 0.5
 And
                finally:6: PERMd = LPERM * ( 0.077 + 1.55 * DENShy - 0.627 * DENShy ^
                2)
 * (PHIe ^ (2 * LPERM)) / ((LPERM ^ 4) * (RW@FT / RESir))) ^ 2
 Where:A = tortuosity exponent (fractional)
 KPERM = permeability constant (fractional)
 LPERM = porosity exponent (fractional)
 DENShy = hydrocarbon density (gm/cc)
 M = cementation exponent (fractional)
 N = saturation exponent (fractional)
 PERMd = calculated permeability (millidarcies)
 PHIe = effective porosity (fractional)
 KBUCKL = porosity saturation product (fractional)
 RESD = resistivity log reading (ohm-m)
 RESir = resistivity at irreducible water saturation (ohm-m)
 RW@FT = water resistivity at formation temperature (ohm-m)
 Sw = water saturation (fractional)
 SWir = irreducible water saturation (fractional)
 
					
			 COMMENTS: Reference:
 1. A New Approach to Improved Log Derived Permeability,
 G.R. Coates, J.L. Dumanoir, SPWLA, 1973.
 
 This complex formula does not lend itself to graphical solution,
                although some charts are provided in the original technical paper.
                A simpler version of this algorithm can be found below.
 
					
			 RECOMMENDED
                PARAMETERS: KPERM is usually set at 90,000, but can be modified with local
                experience.
 
					
			 NUMERICAL
			EXAMPLE Assume data from Classic Example Sand B.
 PHIe = 0.30
 RW@FT = 0.02 ohm-m
 A = 0.62
 M = 2.15
 SWir = Sw = 0.25
 RESD = 20 ohm-m
 N = 2.00
 DENShy = 0.8 gm/cc
 Dumanoir and Coates method:KPERM = 90,000
 LPERM = (3.75 - 0.30 + ((log (0.2 / 20) + 2.2) ^ 2) / 2) ^ 0.5
                = 1.86
 PERMd = 90,000*(0.077+1.55*0.8-0.627*0.8*0.8)*(0.3^(2*1.86)) /
                ((1.86^4)*(0.2/20)))^2
 PERMd = 90,000 * (0.915 * 0.0
 
  Permeability From the Coates Simplified Method
 
					
			 PERMc - Permeability From the Coates Simplified Method This
                is a simplification of an earlier method proposed by Dumanoir
                and Coates. It is more optimistic than other methods in low porosity.
 7: PERMc = GPERM * PHIe ^ 4 * ((PHIt - PHIe * SWir) / (PHIe *
                SWir)) ^ 2
 OR
                in clean zones:8: PERMc = GPERM * PHIe ^ 4 * ((1 - SWir) / SWir) ^ 2
 Where:GPERM = permeability scale factor (fractional)
 PERMc = calculated permeability (millidarcies)
 PHIe = effective porosity (fractional)
 PHIt = total porosity (fractional)
 SWir = irreducible water saturation (fractional)
 
					
			 COMMENTS: This method works well in shaly sands. As the difference between
                PHIt and PHIe increases, PERMc decreases.
 
					
			 RECOMMENDED
                PARAMETERS: GPERM = 6500 to 10000 for oil, 650 to 1000 for gas
 
 
  META/LOG "PERM"  Compare
				Permeability Calculated from Various Methods 
 Download this spreadsheet:
 SPR-24 META/LOG PERMEABILITY CALCULATOR
 Calculate and compare permeability derived from well
			logs,
						5 Methods.
 
 |