| 
					
					
					 Modeling Sonic and Density Logs From Resistivity Resistivity is sometimes transformed into an apparent velocity
				log with a number of different equations:
   
			
			
			 Faust Method This method is very old, but is useful in shallow rock
				sequences, especially clastics. You may need to determine new
				parameters for each major geologic horizon.
 1: Vc = KR1 * RESS ^ (1/KR2) * DEPTH ^ (1/KR3)
 2: DTCsyn = 10^6 / Vc
 
				Where:
                Vc = compressional
				velocity (ft/sec)
 DTCsyn = synthetic (modelled) sonic travel time
				from Faust equation (usec/ft)
 KR1 = Faust constant (2000
				to 3400 for depths in feet)
 RESS = resistivity from
				shallow investigation log (ohm-m}
 DEPTH = depth of layer (ft
				or m)
 KR2 and KR3 = 6.0 or as
				determined by regression analysis
 
				NOTE: Constants given are for depths in FEET.If depths are in meters, convert depth to feet. by multiplying
				depth in meters by 3.281.
 To obtain DTCsyn in usec/m from DTC in usec/ft, divide by 3.281.
 The
				Faust transform can be used when the sonic log is missing, and
				can be calibrated with offset well data, check shots, or
				vertical seismic profiles. The method does not account for gas
				effect. 
					
				
  Smith Method This method uses a simple correlation between resistivity and
				sonic travel time:
  
				_____ 3: DTCsyn = KR4 * (RESS ^ KR5) 
				Where:
                DTCsyn = synthetic (modelled) sonic travel time
				from Smith equation (usec/ft)
 KR4 = Smith constant (90
				to 100 for depths in feet)
 RESS = resistivity from
				shallow investigation log (ohm-m}
 KR5 = -0.15 or as
				determined by regression analysis
 
				NOTE: Constants given are for depths in FEET.If depths are in meters, convert depth to feet. by multiplying
				depth in meters by 3.281.
 To obtain DTCsyn in usec/m from DTC in usec/ft, divide by 3.281.
 The
				method does not account for gas effect. You may need to
				determine new parameters for each major geologic horizon. 
					
				
			 Fischer - Good Method This method assumes a fairly sophisticated log analysis can be
				run on the well in question or on a nearby well. This is needed
				to obtain a list of water resistivity (RWA) versus depth. Since
				most sonic log problems are in shales due to bad hole or rock
				alteration, this calculation is usually possible and should be
				done continuously or at least zone by zone.
 
				Similarly, the apparent RW in shale (RWSH) is needed, based on
				an estimate of the shale total porosity (BVWSH). This can be
				computed continuously or zone by zone from one of the following: If
				neutron and density logs are both available and correct:  
				     
				4: BVWSH = (PHIDSH + PHINSH) / 25: PHIt = (PHID + PHIN
				) / 2
 If
				density log is missing or bad:6: BVWSH = 0.95 *
				PHINSH
 7: PHIt = PHIN
 
				Where the sonic log is behaving properly or from an offset well
				that is OK:8. BVWSH = (DTCSH -
				DTCMA) / (DTCW - DTCMA)
 9. PHIt = (DTC -
				DTCMA) / (DTCW - DTCMA)
 
				Then, for each shale zone:10: RWSH = (BVWSH ^ M) *
				RSH / A
 And,
				for each clean zone:_____11: RWA = (PHIt ^ M) *
				RESD / A
 For
				all digitized intervals or computation layers:_____12: Vshg = (GR - GR0) /
				(GR100 - GR0)
 13: Vshs = (SP - SP0) /
				(SP100 - SP0)
 14: Vsh = Min (Vshg,
				Vshs)
 15: RMIX = 1 / (Vsh /
				RWSH + (1 - Vsh) / RWA)
 16: DTCsyn = DTCMA + (DTCW
				- DTCMA) * (A * RMIX / RESD) ^ (1/M)
 17: DTCyn = Min (DTCsyn,
				DTC)
 18: DENSsyn = DENSMA + (DENSW
				- DENSMA) * (A * RMIX / RESD) ^ (1/M)
 19: DENSsyn = Min
				(DENSsyn, DENS)
 When
				the zone is 100% shale, this equation should return a reasonable
				travel time. If it doesn't match the log where it is believed to
				be good, then adjust RWSH or Vsh. In clean zones, adjust DELTMA
				or RWA if needed. When zones are hydrocarbon bearing, RWA and
				RESD will both be too high, and the result will be close to
				correct, but may give a DELTmod that is too low (too high a
				velocity) or a DENSmod that is too high. To
				overcome some of this effect, you could substitute the shallow
				resistivity RESS for RESD and RMF@FT for RWA. You may still need
				to calibrate the RMF@FT with its own RMFA equation:20: RMFA = (PHIt ^ M) *
				RESS / A
 21: RMIX = 1 / (Vsh /
				RWSH + (1 - Vsh) / RMFA)
 22: DTCsyn = DTCMA + (DTCW
				- DTCMA) * (A * RMIX / RESS) ^ (1/M)
 23: DTCsyn = Min (DTCsyn,
				DTC)
 24: DENSsyn = DENSMA + (DENSW
				- DENSMA) * (A * RMIX / RESS) ^ (1/M)
 25: DENSsyn = Min
				(DENSsyn, DENS)
 
				Where:
                DTCsyn = synthetic (modelled) sonic travel time
			from Fischer and Good equation (usec/ft or usec/m)
 DENSsyn = synthetic (modelled) density from Fischer and Good
			equation (g/cc or kg/m3)
 DTC, DENS = original sonic or density log readings if available
 DTCSH, DTCMA, DYCW = compressional sonic travel time of shale,
			matrix, water values
 DENSSH, DENSMA, DENSW = density of shale, matrix, water values
 PHID, PHIN = density and neutron porosity
 A, M, N = Archie water saturation exponents
 Vsh, PHIt = shale volume and total porosity
 RWSH, RNFA, RNIX = resistivity of water in shale, nudfiltrate, and
			invaded zone
 
 
				Neither method accounts for the effect of gas, which must be
				handled separately. 
 |