| 
					
					
					 Classic
                Dipmeter Patterns On Arrow Plots There are numerous sets of classic dipmeter patterns published
                by the service companies. The set from Western Atlas is included
                here, with captions, to assist you in learning to analyze patterns,
                especially those for which there is more than one interpretation.
                They were chosen over others because they include an SP or GR
                curve shape and a lithologic cross section on the same drawing
                as the dipmeter data for each example.
 Trying
                to analyze a dipmeter without knowing which rocks are shales and
                which are reservoirs is pointless. Don't ignore the evidence from
                the other available logs. Don't try to analyze dipmeters in isolation
                with a blindfold hiding the other logs; use an integrated approach
                incorporating all available data. Since some structural patterns can be confused
                with some stratigraphic ones, you may need to review the stratigraphic
                patterns before settling on the final interpretation. Remember
				that structural dips are found at bed boundaries and inside
				shales. Stratigraphic dips are found inside the sandstone or
				carbonate reservoirs, not outside them. The
                illustrations and text in this section are from "Diplog Interpretation",
                published by Dresser Atlas (now Baker Atlas) in 1984.
 
 
 
				 Regional Dip and Symmetrical Anticline
 Regional
                dip is indicated by the dips recorded in these shale sections.
                The sands are cross-bedded and the limestone fractured, giving
                readings which cannot be interpreted as regional dip. In many
                instances, only one of each 15 or 20 dips reflects actual structural
                dip. An
                anticline well drilled through the crest of an anticline or the
                trough of a syncline would exhibit low angle dips. these dips
                can be low enough to give low angle dip scatter. Wells drilled
                on either flank of this fold will indicate larger and more consistent
                dips. These dips will reflect the structural dip at the point
                where the well cuts the formation.
 
				 Asymmetrical Anticline and Recumbent Syncline
 The
                direction of dip in this asymmetrical anticline decreases until
                the crestal plane of the structure is encountered then increases
                to nearly vertical as the well bore cuts the formations essentially
                parallel to the bedding planes. Other overturned anticlines will
                produce different Diplog patterns depending upon the amount of
                overturning present. Recumbent
                syncline bed "A" is the youngest bed. Beds "B",
                "C", "D", etc., become progressively older.
                A recumbent anticline would be the same except that bed "A"
                would be the oldest bed with the others becoming progressively
                younger. 
				 Recumbent Anticline and Normal Fault -No Drag
 Recumbent
                anticline dip increases to 90 degrees where the borehole crosses
                the vertical section of the fold. Below this the dips are reduced
                and would usually dip in a direction approximately 90 degrees
                to that above the axial plane of the fold. Normal
                fault with no bedding plane distortion. Fault is not apparent
                from Diplog and must be located by other methods. If only one
                well is drilled in an area, this type of fault will normally not
                be found. Bed "E" has been cut out where the borehole
                crosses. If this is the zone of interest, the well must be sidetracked
                or re-drilled to encounter the objective horizon.
 
				 Normal Fault with Drag
 Normal
                fault with fault plane dipping same direction as formation bedding
                planes and exhibiting a small drag zone near the fault plane. Normal
                fault with fault plane dipping opposite to the dip of the formations
                illustrating drag into the fault plane.
 
				 Normal Fault With Rollover and Reverse Fault
                With No Drag
 Normal
                fault with rollover. This is a pattern typical of growth faults
                which frequently exhibit reverse drag or rollover. These rollover
                anticlines are important hydrocarbon traps along the U.S. Gulf
                Coast.  Reverse
                fault with no bedding plane deformation. Beds "D" and
                "E" ad parts of "C" and "F" have
                been repeated. Repetition of beds is good evidence that a fault
                is a reverse fault. 
				 Reverse Faults With Drag
   Reverse
                fault with fault plane dips in the same direction as the dip of
                the beds. Drag zone in both fault blocks. Reverse
                fault with fault plane dips opposite the dip of the formations.
                Drag zone in both fault blocks. Sandstone is assumed to be free
                from cross-bedding in this illustration. 
				 Thrust Faults
 Thrust
                fault with marked bedding plane distortion on both sides of the
                fault plane. This same pattern could be generated by a recumbent
                or overturned fold. In some areas, both thrust faulting and overturned
                folds are commonly encountered. Obviously, the correct interpretation
                of this arrow pattern depends to a considerable extent upon knowledge
                of the regional and local geology. Thrust
                fault with drag on bottom block and little or no deformation of
                the beds above the fault plane. This type of response is shown
                by the Lewis overthrust which has formed Chief Mountain in Glacier
                National Park, Montana.
 You
                should study these patterns carefully, comparing patterns from
                various structures to define differences and similarities. 
 |