| 
					 ELASTIC CONSTANTS BASICS Well logs are often used to determine the
			mechanical properties of rocks. These properties are often called
			the elastic properties or elastic constants of rocks. The subject
			matter and practice of calculating these rock properties is often
			called "rock physics".
 The best known
			elastic constants are the bulk modulus of compressibility, shear
			modulus, Young's
			Modulus (elastic modulus), and Poisson's Ratio. The dynamic elastic
			constants can be derived with appropriate equations, using sonic log
			compressional and shear travel time along with density log data.
 
			Elastic constants
			are needed by five distinct disciplines in the petroleum industry:1. geophysicists interested in using logs to improve
			synthetic seismograms, seismic models, and interpretation of seismic
			attributes, seismic inversion, and processed seismic sections.
 2. production or completion engineers who want to determine
			if sanding or fines migration might be possible, requiring special
			completion operations, such as gravel packs
 3. hydraulic fracture design engineers, who need to know
			rock strength and pressure environments to optimize fracture
			treatments
 4. geologists and engineers interested in in-situ stress
			regimes in naturally fractured reservoirs
 5. drilling engineers who wish to prevent accidentally
			fracturing a reservoir with too high a mud weight, or who wish to
			predict overpressured formations to reduce the risk of a blowout.
 
				
			 
			Mechanical properties are used to
			design hydraulic fracture stimulation programs in oil and gas wells,
			and in the design of mines and gas storage caverns. In this
			situation, the mechanical properties are derived in the laboratory
			or from well log analysis, calibrated to the lab results. 
			In seismic petrophysics, these same mechanical properties are called
			seismic attributes. They are derived by inversion of time-domain
			seismic data, calibrated to results from well log analysis, which in
			turn were calibrated to the lab data. The vertical resolution of
			seismic data is far less than that of well logs, so some filtering
			and up-scaling issues have to be addressed to make the comparisons
			meaningful.
   
			The main purpose for finding  these
			attributes is to distinguish reservoir quality rock from
			non-reservoir. The ultimate goal is to determine porosity,
			lithology, and fluid type by "reverse-engineering" the seismic
			attributes. The process is sometimes called "quantitative seismic
			interpretation". In high porosity areas such as the tar sands, and
			in high contrast areas such as gas filled carbonates,, modest
			success has been achieved, usually after several iterative
			calibrations to log and lab data. Something can be determined in
			almost all reservoirs, but how "quantitative" it is may not be
			known.   
			There are many other types of
			seismic attributes related to the signal frequency, amplitude, and
			phase, as well as spatial attributes that infer geological structure
			and stratigraphy, such as dip angle, dip azimuth, continuity,
			thickness, and a hundred other factors. While logs may be used to
			calibrate or interpret some of these attributes, they are not
			discussed further here.
 
 
  ELASTIC CONSTANTS DEFINITIONS The elastic constants of rocks are defined by the
			Wood-Biot-Gassmann Equations. The
			equations can be transformed to derive
                rock properties from log data. If
                crossed dipole sonic data is available, anisotropic stress can
                be noticed by differences in the X and Y axis displays of both
                the compressional and shear travel times. When this occurs, all
                the elastic constants can be computed for both the minimum and
                maximum stress directions. This requires the original log to be
                correctly oriented with directional information, and may require
                extra processing in the service company computer center.
 
				Elasticity is a property of matter,
                  which causes it to resist deformation in volume or shape.
			Hooke's Law, describing the behavior of elastic materials,
                  states that within elastic limits, the resulting strain is
                  proportional to the applied stress. Stress is the external
                  force applied per unit area (pressure), and strain is the fractional
                  distortion which results because of the acting force. 
 
  The modulus
                  of elasticity is the ratio of stress to strain: 0: M = Pressure / Change in Length =  {F/A}
				/ (dL/L)
 
 This is identical to the definition of Young's Modulus. Both
				names are used in the literature so terminology can be a bit
				confusing.
  Different types of deformation can result,
                  depending upon the mode of the acting force. The three elastic moduli are:  Young's Modulus
				Y (also abbreviated E in various literature), 1: Y = (F/A) / (dL/L)
  Bulk Modulus
				Kc,  2: Kc = (F/A) / (dV/V)
   
 Shear Modulus
				N, (also abbreviated as u (mu))
 3: N = (F/A) / (dX/L) = (F/A) / tanX
  Where:F/A = force per unit area
 dL/L, dV/V, dX/L = fractional strains of length,
                  volume, and shape, respectively.
 Note: dX/L  can be represented by tanX.
  
				 Poisson's Ratio
			PR (also abbreviated v (nu)), is defined
                  as the ratio of strain in a perpendicular direction to the
                  strain in the direction of extensional force, 4: PR = (dX/X) / (dY/Y)
 
 Where:
 X and Y = original dimensions
 dX and
                    dY = changes in X and Y directions respectively, as
 the
              deforming stress acts in Y direction.
  
			Young's Modulus vs Poison's Ratio: Brittleness increases
			toward top left, density increases toward top right, porosity plus
			organic content and depth decrease toward bottom left. PR values
			less than 0.17 indicate gas or organic content or both. (image
			courtesy Canadian Discovery Ltd) 
			All of these
			moduli can be derived directly from well logs and indirectly from
			seismic attributes:5: N = KS5 * DENS / (DTS ^ 2)
 6: R = DTS / DTC
 7: PR = (0.5 * R^2 - 1) / (R^2 - 1)
 8: Kb = KS5 * DENS * (1 / (DTC^2) - 4/3 * (1 / (DTS^2)))
 9: Y = 2 * N * (1 + PR)
 
 Lame's Constant Lambda, (also abbreviated
			
			λ) is a
			measure of a rocks brittleness, which is a function of both Young's
			Modulus and Poisson's Ratio:
 10:  
			
			Lambda = Y * PR / ((1 + PR) * (1 - 2 * PR))
 OR 10A: Lambda = DENS * (Vp^2 - 2 * Vs ^ 2)
 
			Some people prefer different abbreviations: Mu or u
			for shear modulus, Nu or 
			
			v
			for Poisson's Ratio, and E for Young's Modulus. The abbreviations
			used above are used consistently trough these training materials.  
			In the seismic industry, it is common to think in terms of
			velocity and acoustic impedance in addition to the more classical
			mechanical properties described above. 
			The compressional to shear velocity ratio is a good
			lithology indicator:11. R = Vp / Vs = DTS / DTC
 
			Acoustic impedance:12: Zp = DENS / DTC
 13: Zs = DENS / DTS
 
			Where:DTC = compressional sonic travel time
 DTS = shear sonic travel time
 DENS = bulk density
 KS5 = 1000 for metric units
 
			An example of a log analysis for mechanical rock properties
			(elastic constants) is shown below. Coloured dots represent lab
			derived data, and illustrate the close match obtained betwee log
			analysis and lab measured data. 
			
			 
  Dynamic elastic properties calculated from density and sonic log
			data, showing close match to dynamic data from lab measurements
			(coloured dots). Lab data is from table shown above. Note synthetic
			sonic and density plotted next to measured log curves (Tracks 2 and
			3), showing reasonably small differences due to minor borehole
			effects. Synthetic curves can repair worse logs or even replace
			missing curves.
    
					 ELASTIC CONSTANTS CROSSPLOTS Composite seismic attributes, such as Lame's Constant times
			density (Lambda_Rho) and shear modulus times density (Mu_Rho), are
			used to normalize attributes to make interpretation easier. 
					Various crossplots of results are used to
			distinguish differences between rock types, as shown below. The
			colour code represents depth (red-orange = shallower, blue-green =
			deeper)
 
			
			
			 Crossplots of the elastic constants are used to identify variations
			in rock characteristics, by noting changes in the data
			distributions. (RHO = density, PR = Poisson's Ratio, MU = shear
			Modulus, LAMBDA = Lame's Constant, BMOD = bulk modulus, EMOD =
			Young's Modulus, P_IMP = compressional wave acoustic impedance,
			S_IMP = shear wave acoustic impedance, (image courtesy Canadian
			Discover Ltd)
 
 
  EFFECTS OF ANISOTROPY The elastic constants are often considered to be uniform in the
			three cardinal axes. Under this assumption, a sonic log would read
			the same value in all directions. However, in a rock under
			horizontal tectonic stress, there is a minimum and a maximum stress
			direction, and the acoustic properties vary with that stress. Using
			the crossed dipole mode of the dipole shear sonic log, we can
			provide acoustic velocity (or travel time) in these two directions.
 
				 Example of a dipole shear image log run in crossed dipole
                    mode. It has two compressional and two shear curves measured
				in orthogonal directions. An anisotropy coefficient
                    can be computed from the difference between the two
				compressional curves - note the interval near the top f the log
				where the curves separate and the image log gets "shaky",
				indicating stress anisotropy. Fractures are indicated
				where the high amplitude (red colour on image log) disappears.
 
				Full wave, array, and dipole sonic log presentations
                  vary widely, depending on age, service company, and intended
                  use. 
			Acoustic anisotropy coefficient is defined as:1: Kani = 0.5 * (Vmax - Vmin) / (Vmax + Vmin)
 
 Where:
 Kani = anisotropy coefficient (fractional)
 Vmin = minimum acoustic (seismic) velocity (m/sec or ft/sec)
 Vmax = maximum acoustic (seismic) velocity (m/sec or ft/sec)
 
			Equation 1 can be rewritten in log analysis terms as:2: Kani = 0.5 * (DTCmax - DTCmin) / (DTCmax +
			DTCmin)
 
			Because of tool rotation, the log curves that represents the
			maximum and minimum values trade places, so the best solution is to
			take the absolute value of the difference between the two sonic log
			curves in the numerator. Some people multiply the anisotropy
			coefficient by 100 and display it as a percentage. Typical values
			range from zero for no anisotropy to as much as 25% in highly
			stressed regions. 
			An anisotropy coefficient based on resistivity values is
			also generated from well logs, but it has nothing to do with stress
			assessments. In this case it refers to the differences between
			vertical and horizontal resistivity in laminated rocks.:3: AnisRatio = RESvert / REShoriz
 4: AnisCoef = AnisRatio ^ 0.5
 
			The resistivity ratio as defined here is nearly always
			greater than 1.0, and some literature uses the inverse of these
			terms, maintaining the same nomenclature.. 
  LAB
			MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES Elastic properties are measured in the laboratory using triaxial
				stress tests (static measurements) and by measuring bulk density
				and acoustic travel time with a high frequency impulse (dynamic
				testing). Both are done under representative overburden
				pressure.
 
			The general
			procedures for triaxial compressive test are:1. A right cylindrical plug is cut from the sample core and
			their ends ground parallel according to International Society for
			Rock Mechanics (ISRM) and American Society for Testing and Materials
			(ASTM) standards.  A length to diameter ratio of 2:1 is recommended
			to obtain representative mechanical properties of the sample, which
			is also recommended by ASTM and ISRM.  Physical dimensions and
			weight of the specimen are recorded and the specimen is saturated
			with simulated formation brine.
 
 
  2. The specimen is then placed between two plates and a heat-shrink
			jacket is placed over the specimen. 
 3. Axial strain and radial strain devices are mounted in the
			endcaps and on the lateral surface of the specimen, respectively.
 
 4. The specimen assembly is placed into the pressure vessel and
			the pressure vessel is filled with hydraulic oil.
 
 5. Confining pressure is increased to the desired hydrostatic testing
			pressure.
 
 6. Measure ultrasonic velocities at the hydrostatic confining
			pressure.
 
 7. Specimen assembly is brought into contact with a loading
			piston that allows application of axial load.
 
 8. Increase axial load at a constant rate until the specimen fails
			or axial strain reaches a desired amount of strain while confining
			pressure is held constant.
 
			   9. Reduce axial stress to the initial hydrostatic condition after
			sample fails or reaches a desired axial strain.
 10. Reduce confining pressure to zero and disassemble sample.
 
				
					
						| 
						
						Depth(m)
 | 
						
						
						ConfiningPressure (psi)
 | 
						
						
						CompressiveStrength (psi)
 | 
						
						StaticYoung's
 Modulus
 (x106 psi)
 | 
						
						StaticPoisson's
 Ratio
 |  
						| 
						
						XX51.50 | 
						
						3850 | 
						
						63359 | 
						
						8.70 | 
						
						0.40 |  
						| 
						
						XX61.15 | 
						
						3850 | 
						
						56831 | 
						
						5.75 | 
						
						0.36 |  
						| 
						
						XX71.15 | 
						
						3850 | 
						
						56026 | 
						
						5.79 | 
						
						0.34 |  
						| 
						
						XX05.20 | 
						
						3850 | 
						
						50910 | 
						
						5.08 | 
						
						0.39 |  
				
				Static elastic properties
				measured with triaxial stress test
 
				
					| 
					
					Depth | 
					
					Bulk | 
					
					Ultrasonic
					Wave Velocity | 
					
					Dynamic
					Elastic Parameter | 
					
					  |  
					| 
					
					 m | 
					
					Densityg/cc
 | 
					
					
					Compressionalft/sec  usec/ft
 | 
					
					Shearft/sec
 | 
					
					usec/ft
 | 
					
					Young's
					Modulus (x106 psi) | 
					
					Poisson's 
					
					Ratio | 
					
					Bulk Modulus
					(x106 psi) | 
					
					Shear
					Modulus (x106 psi) |  
					| 
					
					XX51.50 | 
					
					2.81 | 
					
					20161 | 
					
					49.60 | 
					
					10760 | 
					
					92.94 | 
					
					11.39 | 
					
					0.30 | 
					
					9.53 | 
					
					4.38 |  
					| 
					
					XX61.15 | 
					
					2.57 | 
					
					15829 | 
					
					63.18 | 
					
					9555 | 
					
					104.66 | 
					
					7.68 | 
					
					0.21 | 
					
					4.46 | 
					
					3.16 |  
					| 
					
					XX71.15 | 
					
					2.66 | 
					
					17226 | 
					
					58.05 | 
					
					10299 | 
					
					97.10 | 
					
					9.30 | 
					
					0.22 | 
					
					5.57 | 
					
					3.81 |  
					| 
					
					
					XX05.20 | 
					
					
					2.64 | 
					
					
					16451 | 
					
					
					60.79 | 
					
					
					9763 | 
					
					
					102.43 | 
					
					
					8.31 | 
					
					
					0.23 | 
					
					
					5.10 | 
					
					
					3.38 |  
			Dynamic elastic properties
			measured with ultrasonic impulse in the lab. Note differences
			between static and dynamic values. Elastic properties from log
			analysis models match lab dynamic data better than static data.
 
			
			 
  Dynamic elastic properties calculated from density and sonic log
			data, showing close match to dynamic data from lab measurements
			(coloured dots). Lab data is from table shown above. Note synthetic
			sonic and density plotted next to measured log curves (Tracks 2 and
			3), showing reasonably small differences due to minor borehole
			effects. Synthetic curves can repair worse logs or even replace
			missing curves.
    
			
			
			 Examples of Mechanical Properties Logs The format and curve complement of Mechanical Properties Logs vary widely between service
                companies and age of log. Some logs have Metric depths but the moduli are in English units. Some are vice versa. Here are some
                examples.
 
			
			 
  Example of log reconstruction in a shaly sand sequence (Dunvegan).
			The 3 tracks on the left show the measured gamma ray, caliper,
			density, and compressional sonic. Original density and sonic are
			shown in black, modeled logs are in colour. Shear sonic is the model
			result as none was recorded in this well. Computed elastic
			properties are shown in the right hand tracks. Results from the
			original unedited curves are shown in black, those after log editing
			are in colour. Note that the small differences in the modeled logs
			compared to the original curves propagate into larger differences in
			the results, especially Poisson's Ratio (PR), Young's Modulus (ED),
			and total closure stress (TCS).
 
 
				 Mechanical properties log with lithology/porosity track at
				the right. This analysis was run to find out if sanding might
				occur during production from the oil zone. High bulk modulus and
				low sher modulus suggest sanding is like. Stress failre (shaded
				black in Track 1) shows where sanding is most likely to occur.
 
 |