| 
					
					
					 Environmental Corrections for Resistivity Water saturation calculations require a good value for formation
                resistivity, commonly called true resistivity or Rt, as well as
                shale corrected porosity (PHIe), and the shale content (Vsh). Therefore, the
                resistivity log may need some environmental corrections before
                use in the saturation equations.
 
			The
			corrections on this page are for older style induction logs and
			laterologs, and are shown for illustration purposes only. Use the
			appropriate charts for the specific tool that was run on your well.
			Note that invasion corrections, covered in the next Section, apply
			only to water zones and oil zone cases have not been published
			anywhere. On modern array induction logs, invasion corrections for
			both water and oil zone cases are applied by the service company to
			create Rt and Rxo curves. These algorithms have not been published. 
			Commercial log analysis software may use generic or obsolete
			environmental corrections, so care in the use of these corrections
			is required. No software package has individual corrections for
			every possible tool type from all service companies. Borehole
                corrections for mud salinity and hole diameter should be applied
                first, if needed. Most computer aided log analysis software has
                this capability. Fortunately, borehole corrections can often be
                safely ignored when the log is run in a good borehole with a good
                mud system. The newest array induction logs attempt to produce
                Rt with all corrections applied. Do not over correct your data
				by applying the corrections a second time. 
					
				
				
			 Borehole Environment Corrections to Resistivity For
                those who insist on superfluous detail, formulae are provided
                here for the deep induction log for 1.5 inches standoff, the usual case:
   
				 Borehole correction for deep induction - standoff
                = 1.5 inches
 Note
                that the abbreviations shown above are those used in this FORTRAN
                program and do not conform to abbreviations used in this Handbook.
                Hole size is in inches and correction to the code for metric dimensions
                is required. Charts for these formulae are given below for various tool types. 
				 Borehole correction for medium induction log
 
				 Borehole correction for deep induction log
 
				 Borehole correction for deep laterolog (dual)
 
				 Borehole correction for shallow laterolog (dual)
 
				 Borehole correction for laterolog (single)
 It
                is instructive to determine the borehole corrections for some
                typical cases and run a sensitivity study with one of the saturation
                equations to see if the corrections have a measurable impact. 
					
			 Induction Log Borehole Corrections IES ang DIL ONLY
 The
                borehole signal for induction logs is subtracted from the induction
                conductivity measurement and reciprocated to obtain corrected
                resistivity.
 1: RESDc = 1000 / (1000 / RESD - BHGD)
 2: RESMc = 1000 / (1000 / RESM - BHGM)
 Where:BHGD = deep resistivity correction (mS/m)
 BHGM = medium resistivity correction (mS/m)
 RESD = deep resistivity reading (ohm-m)
 RESDc = deep resistivity corrected for borehole effect (ohm-m)
 RESM = medium resistivity reading (ohm-m)
 RESMc = medium resistivity corrected for borehole (ohm-m)
 COMMENTS:The values for BHGD and BHGM are to be taken from
				charts similar to those shown below, or from curve fits to these charts. Some computer programs
                use a look-up table. These charts are for Schlumberger’s
                6FF40 tool. Different charts and look-up tables are needed for
                other induction logging tool designs.
 
 
  Laterolog Borehole Corrections DLL Only
 The
                borehole correction for laterologs is a correction factor which
                is divided into the original log reading to obtain the corrected
                value.
 3: RESDc = RESD / CFD
 4: RESMc = RESM / CFM
 5: RESEDITFLAG$ = "BH"
 Where:CFD = borehole effect correction factor for deep laterolog
 CFM = borehole effect correction factor for shallow laterolog
 RESD = deep resistivity reading (ohm-m)
 RESDc = deep resistivity corrected for borehole effect (ohm-m)
 RESM = medium resistivity reading (ohm-m)
 RESMc = medium resistivity corrected for borehole (ohm-m)
 
					
			 COMMENTS: The values for CFD and CFM are to be taken from
				appropriate charts, or from curve fits to these charts. Some computer programs
                use a look-up table. These charts are for Schlumberger’s
                DLL tool. Different charts and look-up tables are needed for other
                laterolog tool designs.
 
  Invasion Corrections The
                second correction is for the effects of invasion of mud filtrate
                into the formation. Knowledge of the invasion profile can be used
                to correct the deep resistivity log for this effect. The profile
                knowledge comes from the medium and shallow resistivity data when
                compared to the deep resistivity. Correction charts are
				available for various tool types, and are usually known as
				Tornado Charts due to the shape of the lines on the graph.
 
			Sometimes the log data does not fit inside the body of lines on the
			chart. A pragmatic solution is to lower the deep resistivity by a an
			offset based on the difference between the logarithm of the shallow
			resistivity and the logarithm of the medium resistivity. An example
			is shown below. The equations to run standard invasion corrections
			follow. Note the warning at the end of this section. 
			
			 Original logs showing deep invasion on resistivity, with hydrocarbon
			volume (shaded red) and water saturation based on the deep
			resistivity as recorded.
 
 
  Invasion corrected deep resistivity (dashed purple) is a linear
			shift of the logarithm of the original deep resistivity (dashed
			red). Note that the water zone now looks wet, the zone no longer
			triggers a pay flag, and original hydrocarbon -- water contact is
			now more clearly defined in this depleted reservoir.
 In the above example, the need for
			invasion corrections is inferred from the fact that no oil or gas
			was produced from the perforations annotated at the top of the zone.
			If hydrocarbons had been produced, the deep resistivity would need
			to be increased. The published Tornado Charts for induction logs
			never increase resistivity, so they are meant only for wet or
			depleted intervals. 
			
  Invasion Correction for Induction Logs The
                invasion corrections for dual induction logs are computed as follows:
 6: IF RESD < RESM
 7: AND IF RESM < RESS
 8: THEN H = RESS / RESD - 1
 9: B = RESM / RESD - 1
 10: C = H / B
 11: D = 0.59 * H - 2.21 * C + 1.35
 12: E = - 1.44 * H + 2.47 * C - 2.76
 13: G = - 0.5 * ((D ^ 2 - 4 * E) ^ 0.5 + D)
 14: IF RESD >= RESM
 15: OR IF RESM >= RESS
 16: THEN G = 1.0
 17: RESDc = G * RESD
 Where:B = intermediate term
 C = intermediate term
 D = intermediate term
 E = intermediate term
 G = intermediate term
 H = intermediate term
 RESD = deep resistivity log reading (ohm-m)
 RESDc = deep resistivity log reading corrected for invasion (ohm-m)
 RESM = medium resistivity log reading (ohm-m)
 RESS = shallow resistivity log reading (ohm-m)
 COMMENTS:If the medium and deep resistivity logs read the same value, then
                either no correction is needed because invasion is very shallow,
                or no correction is possible because invasion is extremely deep.
                These formulae are shown graphically below. Newer tools
                need different charts.
 RESDc
                is often called Rt, the "true" resistivity - see warning
                below.
 
 
					
			 NUMERICAL
                EXAMPLE: 1. For example, the data for Sand D gives:
 RESS = 2.0
 RESM = 1.5
 RESD = 1.0
 H = 2.0 / 1.0 - 1 = 1.0
 B = 1.5 / 1.0 - 1 = 0.5
 C = 1.0 / 0.5 = 2.0
 D = 0.59 * 1.0 - 2.21 * 2.0 + 1.35 = -2.48
 G = - 0.5 * ((2.48 ^ 2 - 4 * 0.74) ^ 0.5 - 2.48) = 0.35
 RESDc = 0.35 * 1.0 = 0.35
 Thus,
                invasion is so deep that the dual induction reads nearly three
                times too high. If this is a water zone, the correction is reasonable.
                If it is hydrocarbon bearing, the correction makes no sense. 
				 Invasion correction for dual induction
 
                
                  | CRAIN'S
                      OPINIONATED OPINIONCAUTION: The invasion correction for induction logs as defined
                      by service company charts always reduces Rt. This is fine
                      in a water zone but is dead wrong in oil or gas zones, where
                      Rt is usualy too low due to invasion of water. Lowering
                      it even more is just too dumb for words. Therefore, DO NOT
                      apply invasion corrections from these charts in hydrocarbon
                      zones. Most software allows you to turn off these offensive
                      corrections.
 |  
 Below
                is a sample sensitivity analysis that shows the correction factor
                Rt/RESD is greater than 1.0 for many real situations. The same
                factor (Rt/Rild) on above graph is never greater than 1.0.  
                
                  | 
                      
                        | 
                            SENSITIVITY
                              ANALYSIS
							WATER
                              SATURATION AND RESISTIVITY WITH INVASION |  |  
                  | 
                      
                        | Archie's
                            Equation |  
                        |  | Sw
                            = (A * RW@FT / (PHIe ^ M) / Rt) ^ (1 / N) |  
                        |  |  |  
                        | Assume
                            A=1.0, M = N = 2.0 |  
                        |  | Sw
                          = (RW@FT / (PHIe ^ 2) / Rt) ^ 0.5 |  
                        |  |  |  
                        | Rearrange
                            terms |  
                        |  | Sw^2
                            = (RW@FT / (PHIe ^ 2) / Rt) |  
                        |  |  |  
                        | Solve
                            for Rt in uninvaded oil zone |  
                        |  | Rt=
                          (RW@FT / (PHIe ^ 2) / Sw^2) |  
                        |  |  |  
                        | Solve
                            for Rxo in invaded oil zone |  
                        |  | Rxo=
                          (RMF@FT / (PHIe ^ 2) / Sxo^2) |  
                        |  |  |  
                        | Solve
                          for R0 in uninvaded water zone |  
                        |  | R0=
                          (RW@FT / (PHIe ^ 2) |  
                        |  |  |  
                        | Assume
                            RESD gets 50% of signal from invaded zone and 50%
                            from uninvaded zone |  
                        |  | RESD
                            = 1 / ((1 / Rt + 1 / Rxo) / 2) |  
                        |  |  |  
                        | Solve
                          for SWa in invaded oil or water zone |  
                        |  | Swa
                          = (RW@FT / (PHIe ^ 2) / RESD) ^ 0.5 |  
                        |  |  |  
                        | Multiply
                            deep resistivity (RESD) by Rt/RESD ratio to obtain
                            Rt from RESD |  |  
                  | 
 
                      
                        | INVADED
                          OIL ZONE Sw=0.25 RMF@FT=1.000 |  | Sxo=0.6 | Sxo=0.8 | Sxo=1.0 | Sw=1.0 |  
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | RW@FT | PHIe | Rt | Rxo | R0 | RESD | SWa | Rt/RESD | Rt/RESD | Rt/RESD | Rt/RESD |  
                        | 0.25 | 0.25 | 64.0 | 44.4 | 4.0 | 52.5 | 0.28 | 1.22 | 1.78 | 2.50 | 0.63 |  
                        | 0.25 | 0.15 | 177.8 | 123.5 | 11.1 | 145.7 | 0.28 | 1.22 | 1.78 | 2.50 | 0.63 |  
                        | 0.10 | 0.25 | 25.6 | 44.4 | 1.6 | 32.5 | 0.22 | 0.79 | 1.01 | 1.30 | 0.55 |  
                        | 0.10 | 0.15 | 71.1 | 123.5 | 4.4 | 90.2 | 0.22 | 0.79 | 1.01 | 1.30 | 0.55 |  
                        | 0.03 | 0.25 | 7.7 | 44.4 | 0.5 | 13.1 | 0.19 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.52 |  
                        | 0.03 | 0.15 | 21.3 | 123.5 | 1.3 | 36.4 | 0.19 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.52 |  |  
                  | 
 
                      
                        | INVADED
                          OIL ZONE Sw=0.25 RMF@FT=0.50 |  | Sxo=0.6 | Sxo=0.8 | Sxo=1.0 | Sw=1.0 |  
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | RW@FT | PHIe | Rt | Rxo | R0 | RESD | SWa | Rt/RESD | Rt/RESD | Rt/RESD | Rt/RESD |  
                        | 0.25 | 0.25 | 64.0 | 22.2 | 4.0 | 33.0 | 0.35 | 1.94 | 3.06 | 4.50 | 0.75 |  
                        | 0.25 | 0.15 | 177.8 | 61.7 | 11.1 | 91.6 | 0.35 | 1.94 | 3.06 | 4.50 | 0.75 |  
                        | 0.10 | 0.25 | 25.6 | 22.2 | 1.6 | 23.8 | 0.26 | 1.08 | 1.52 | 2.10 | 0.60 |  
                        | 0.10 | 0.15 | 71.1 | 61.7 | 4.4 | 66.1 | 0.26 | 1.08 | 1.52 | 2.10 | 0.60 |  
                        | 0.03 | 0.25 | 7.7 | 22.2 | 0.5 | 11.4 | 0.21 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.98 | 0.53 |  
                        | 0.03 | 0.15 | 21.3 | 61.7 | 1.3 | 31.7 | 0.21 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 0.98 | 0.56 |  |  
                  | 
 
                      
                        | INVADED
                          OIL ZONE Sw=0.25 RMF@FT=0.25 RMF@FT |  | Sxo=0.6 | Sxo=0.8 | Sxo=1.0 | Sw=1.0 |  
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | RW@FT | PHIe | Rt | Rxo | R0 | RESD | SWa | Rt/RESD | Rt/RESD | Rt/RESD | Rt/RESD |  
                        | 0.25 | 0.25 | 64.0 | 11.1 | 4.0 | 18.9 | 0.46 | 3.38 | 5.62 | 8.50 | 1.00 |  
                        | 0.25 | 0.15 | 177.8 | 30.9 | 11.1 | 52.6 | 0.46 | 3.38 | 5.62 | 8.50 | 1.00 |  
                        | 0.10 | 0.25 | 25.6 | 11.1 | 1.6 | 15.5 | 0.32 | 1.65 | 2.55 | 3.70 | 0.70 |  
                        | 0.10 | 0.15 | 71.1 | 30.9 | 4.4 | 43.0 | 0.32 | 1.65 | 2.55 | 3.70 | 0.70 |  
                        | 0.03 | 0.25 | 7.7 | 11.1 | 0.5 | 9.1 | 0.23 | 0.85 | 1.11 | 1.46 | 0.56 |  
                        | 0.03 | 0.15 | 21.3 | 30.9 | 1.3 | 25.2 | 0.23 | 0.85 | 1.11 | 1.46 | 0.56 |  |  
                  | 
 
                      
                        | INVADED
                          OIL ZONE Sw=0.25 RMF@FT=0.10 RMF@FT |  | Sxo=0.6 | Sxo=0.8 | Sxo=1.0 | Sw=1.0 |  
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | RW@FT | PHIe | Rt | Rxo | R0 | RESD | SWa | Rt/RESD | Rt/RESD | Rt/RESD | Rt/RESD |  
                        | 0.25 | 0.25 | 64.0 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 8.3 | 0.69 | 7.70 | 13.30 | 20.5 | 1.75 |  
                        | 0.25 | 0.15 | 177.8 | 12.3 | 11.1 | 23.1 | 0.69 | 7.70 | 13.30 | 20.5 | 1.75 |  
                        | 0.10 | 0.25 | 25.6 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 7.6 | 0.46 | 3.38 | 5.62 | 8.50 | 1.00 |  
                        | 0.10 | 0.15 | 71.1 | 12.3 | 4.4 | 21.0 | 0.46 | 3.38 | 5.62 | 8.50 | 1.00 |  
                        | 0.03 | 0.25 | 7.7 | 4.4 | 0.5 | 5.6 | 0.29 | 1.36 | 2.04 | 2.90 | 0.65 |  
                        | 0.03 | 0.15 | 21.3 | 12.3 | 1.3 | 15.6 | 0.29 | 1.36 | 2.04 | 2.90 | 0.65 |  |  
                  |  |  
 
					
  Invasion Correction for Laterologs The
                invasion corrections for dual laterologs are computed as follows:
 18: IF RESD / RESS <= 1
 19: THEN RESDc = 1.7 * RESD - 0.7 * RESM
 20: IF RESD / RESM >= 1.1
 21: THEN RESDc = 1.1 * RESD
 22: C = RESM / RESS * (RESD - RESS) / (RESD - RESM)
 23: IF C = 1 / 1.7
 24: THEN RESDc = RESD
 25: IF C # 1 / 1.78
 26: THEN RESDc = 2.18 * C * RESD / (1.78 * C - 1)
 27: OTHERWISE RESDc = RESD
 Where:C = intermediate term
 RESD = deep resistivity log reading (ohm-m)
 RESDc = deep resistivity log reading corrected for invasion (ohm-m)
 RESM = medium resistivity log reading (ohm-m)
 RESS = shallow resistivity log reading (ohm-m)
 COMMENTS:If the medium and deep resistivity logs read the same value, then
                either no correction is needed because invasion is very shallow,
                or no correction is possible because invasion is extremely deep.
                These formulae are shown graphically below. Newer tools
                need different charts.
 
				 Invasion correction for dual laterolog
 This
                chart can raise or lower the Rt. Use the correction only if the
                correction raises Rt. The reader is encouraged to run a sensitivity
                analysis, similar to the one shown earlier for induction logs,
                for the laterolog in a salt mud case and a fresh mud case.   
					
			 NUMERICAL
                EXAMPLE: 1. Assume a dual laterolog had been run, the log might have read:
 RESD = 2.0
 RESM = 1.5
 RESS = 1.0
 C = 1.5 / 1.0 * (2.0 - 1.0) / (2.0 - 1.5) = 3.00
 RESDc = 2.18 * 3.00 * 2.0 / (1.78 * 3.00 - 1) = 3.00
   
  Calculating Diameter of Invasion The invasion correction described above can also be used to calculate
                an apparent invasion diameter (Di). On some modern logs, this
				result is calculated by the service company.  The generic formulae are:
 For dual induction logs:30: C = (RESM / RESDc) * (RESD - RESDc) / (RESM - RESD)
 31: Di = 33 * (C + 1) - min (100, 10 ^ (0.5 * C - 0.04))
 
 For dual laterolog:
 32: IF RESDc / RESD > 1
 33: THEN Di = 10 ^ (RESDc / RESD
			- 1)
 34: IF RESDc / RESD < 1
 35: THEN Di = 160 * (1 - RESD / RESDc)
 36:: OTHERWISE Di = 0.0
 Where:Di = diameter of invasion (inches)
 RESD = deep resistivity log reading (ohm-m)
 RESDc = corrected deep resistivity reading (ohm-m)
 RESM = medium resistivity log reading (ohm-m)
 COMMENTS:Di is
				in inches; multiply by 25.4 to get millimeters.
 
 If RESDc / RESD = 1; Di cannot be determined.
 While
                diameter of invasion is not used to correct other data, it is
                a useful quality control indicator. 
					
			 NUMERICAL
                EXAMPLE: 1. Data for Sand D gives:
 RESS = 2.0
 RESM = 1.5
 RESD = 1.0
 RESDc = 0.35 from previous example
  C
                = (1.5 / 0.35) * (1.0 - 0.35) / (1.5 - 1.0) = 5.57Di = 33 * (5.57 + 1) - min (100, 10 ^ (0.5 * 5.57 - 0.04)) = 116
                inches
 
 |