| 
					 SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES BASICS Seismic petrophysics, at its best, tries to quantify reservoir
			properties from seismic data instead of from well logs.
			Sophisticated data processing with high quality seismic data can
			come close to achieving this, at least in some cases.  The process
			is called seismic inversion and the results are often called seismic
			attributes. These atributes are closely related to the mechanical
			properties (elastic constants) of the rocks, which in turn can be
			transformed into reservoir properties of interest, such as porosity,
			lithology, or fluid type.
 
			The
			process is sometimes called "quantitative seismic interpretation".
			In high porosity areas such as the tar sands, and in high contrast
			areas such as gas filled carbonates, modest success has been
			achieved, usually after several iterative calibrations to log and
			lab data. Something can be determined in almost all reservoirs, but
			how "quantitative" it is may not be known. Semi-quantitative or
			qualitative attribute presentations are often sufficient to create a
			reasonable image of the reservoir. 
			
			Today, seismic processing and well log analysis are combined to
			determine seismic attributes. The vertical resolution of seismic
			data is far less than that of well logs, so some filtering and
			up-scaling issues have to be addressed to make the comparisons
			meaningful.There are many other types of seismic attributes, related to the
			signal frequency, amplitude, and phase, as well as spatial
			attributes that infer geological structure and stratigraphy, such as
			dip angle, dip azimuth, continuity, thickness, and a hundred other
			factors. While logs may be used to calibrate or interpret some of
			these attributes, they are not discussed further here. 
 
  The
			best known elastic constants are the bulk modulus of
			compressibility, shear modulus, Young's Modulus (elastic modulus),
			and Poisson's Ratio. The dynamic elastic constants can be derived
			with appropriate equations, using sonic log compressional and shear
			travel time along with density log data. Specific forms of seismic
			inversion can approximate the log analysis res 
				Elasticity is a property of matter,
                  which causes it to resist deformation in volume or shape.
			Hooke's Law, describing the behavior of elastic materials,
                  states that within elastic limits, the resulting strain is
                  proportional to the applied stress. Stress is the external
                  force applied per unit area (pressure), and strain is the fractional
                  distortion which results because of the acting force. 
 The modulus
                  of elasticity is the ratio of stress to strain:
 0: M = Pressure / Change in Length =  {F/A}
				/ (dL/L)
 
 This is identical to the definition of Young's Modulus. Both
				names are used in the literature so terminology can be a bit
				confusing.
 
			 Different types of
			deformation can result,
                  depending upon the mode of the acting force. The three elastic moduli are: Young's Modulus
				Y (also abbreviated E in various literature), 1: Y = (F/A) / (dL/L)
  Bulk Modulus
				Kc, 2: Kc = (F/A) / (dV/V)
  Shear Modulus
				N, (also abbreviated as u (mu))3: N = (F/A) / (dX/L) = (F/A) / tanX
  Where F/A is the force per unit area
                  and dL/L, dV/V, and (dX/L) = tanX are the fractional strains of length,
                  volume, and shape, respectively.         
				 Poisson's Ratio
			PR (also abbreviated v (nu)),  defined
                  as the ratio of strain in a perpendicular direction to the
                  strain in the direction of extensional force, 4: PR = (dX/X) / (dY/Y)
 
 Where X and Y are the original dimensions, and dX and
                    dY are the changes in x and y directions respectively, as the
              deforming stress acts in y direction.
  
			Young's Modulus vs Poison's Ratio: Brittleness increases
			toward top left, density increases toward top right, porosity plus
			organic content and depth decrease toward bottom left. PR values
			less than 0.17 indicate gas or organic content or both. (image
			courtesy Canadian Discovery Ltd) 
			All of these
			moduli can be derived directly from well logs and indirectly from
			seismic attributes:5: N = KS5 * DENS / (DTS ^ 2)
 6: R = DTS / DTC
 7: PR = (0.5 * R^2 - 1) / (R^2 - 1)
 8: Kb = KS5 * DENS *(1 / (DTC^2) - 4/3 * (1 / (DTS^2)))
 9: Y = 2 * N * (1 + PR)
 
 Lame's Constant Lambda, (also abbreviated
			
			λ) is a
			measure of a rocks brittleness, which is a function of both Young's
			Modulus and Poisson's Ratio:
 10:  
			
			Lambda = Y * PR / ((1 + PR) * (1 - 2 * PR))
 OR 10A: Lambda = DENS * (Vp^2 - 2 * Vs ^ 2)
 
			Some people prefer different abbreviations: Mu or u
			for shear modulus, Nu or 
			
			v
			for Poisson's Ratio, and E for Young's Modulus. The abbreviations
			used above are used consistently trough these training materials.  
			In the seismic industry, it is common to think in terms of
			velocity and acoustic impedance in addition to the more classical
			mechanical properties described above. 
			The compressional to shear velocity ratio is a good
			lithology indicator:11. R = Vp / Vs = DTS / DTC
 
			Acoustic impedance:12: Zp = DENS / DTC
 13: Zs = DENS / DTS
 
			Where:DTC = compressional sonic travel time
 DTS = shear sonic travel time
 DENS = bulk density
 KS5 = 1000 for metric units
 
			An example of a log analysis for mechanical rock properties
			(elastic constants) is shown below. Coloured dots represent lab
			derived data, and illustrate the close match obtained betwee log
			analysis and lab measured data. 
			
			 
  Dynamic elastic properties calculated from density and sonic log
			data, showing close match to dynamic data from lab measurements
			(coloured dots). Lab data is from table shown above. Note synthetic
			sonic and density plotted next to measured log curves (Tracks 2 and
			3), showing reasonably small differences due to minor borehole
			effects. Synthetic curves can repair worse logs or even replace
			missing curves.
    
			Composite seismic attributes, such as Lame's Constant times
			density (Lambda_Rho) and shear modulus times density (Mu_Rho), are
			used to normalize attributes to make interpretation easier.
			Various crossplots of results are used to
			distinguish differences between rock types, as shown below. The
			colour code represents depth (red-orange = shallower, blue-green =
			deeper) 
			
			
			 Crossplots of the elastic constants are used to identify variations
			in rock characteristics, by noting changes in the data
			distributions. (RHO = density, PR = Poisson's Ratio, MU = shear
			Modulus, LAMBDA = Lame's Constant, BMOD = bulk modulus, EMOD =
			Young's Modulus, P_IMP = compressional wave acoustic impedance,
			S_IMP = shear wave acoustic impedance, (image courtesy Canadian
			Discover Ltd)
 
			
			The current capability of seismic inversion has made significant
			progress in the accuracy of seismic attributes and the
			interpretation of the results. The following example is from  
			"Quantitative Seismic Interpretation in the
			Canadian Oil Sands" 
			by Laurie Weston Bellman,
			Dubai, 2012.   
			
			 Illustrated workflow for a quantitative seismic inversion for
			lithology and fluid type. STime domain seismic data is inverted into
			ccompressional, shear, and Lambda domains. Well log data is
			transformed into the same parameters and crossplotted. These
			crossplots are used to limit similar crossplots derived from the
			iseismic inversions. The final prodoct is an inversion showings sand
			with bitumen (light colour), bottom water (blue), top gas (green)
			and shale (black). 
			
			
			(image courtesy Canadian Discover Ltd)
 
			
			 Enlarged detail of quantitative seismic inversion - colours same as
			previous example.(image
			courtesy Canadian Discover Ltd)
 
			
			
			
			 ELASTIC
			CONSTANTS THEORY The velocity of sound in a rock is related to the elastic properties
			of the rock/fluid mixture and its density, according to the Wood,
			Biot, and Gassmann equations.
 The
			composite compressional bulk modulus of fluid in the pores (inverse
			of fluid compressibility) is:   ____   
			1:  Kf = 1/Cf = Sw / Cwtr + (1 - Sw) / Coil
 OR
			1a: Kf = 1/Cf = Sw / Cwtr + (1 - Sw) / Cgas
 The pore
			space bulk modulus (Kp) is derived from the porosity, fluid, and
			matrix rock properties:2: ALPHA = 1 - Kb /
			Km
 3: Kp = ALPHA^2 /
			((ALPHA - PHIt) / PHIt / Kf )
 The
			composite rock/fluid compressional bulk modulus is:4: Kc = Kp + Kb + 4/3
			* N
 
			Compressional and shear velocity (or travel time) depend on density
			and on the elastic properties, so we need a density value that
			reflects the actual composition of the rock fluid mixture:5:  DENS = (1 - Vsh) * (PHIe * Sw * DENSW + PHIe * (1 - Sw) * DENSHY +
			(1 - PHIe) * DENSMA)
 + Vsh * DENSSH
 
			Compressional velocity (Vp) and shear velocity (Vs) are defined as:6: Vp = KS4 * (Kc /
			DENS) ^ 0.5
 7: Vs = KS4 * (N /
			DENS) ^ 0.5
 
 Although it is not a precise
			solution, we often invert equations 5 and 6 to solve for Kb and N
			from sonic log compressional and shear travel time values.
 Where:ALPHA = Biot's elastic parameter (fractional)
 Cgas = gas compressibility (1/GPa)
 Coil = oil compressibility (1/GPa)
 Cwtr = water compressibility (1/GPa)
 DENS = rock density (g/cc)
 DENSW = density of fluid in the pores (g/cc)
 DTC = compressional sonic travel time (usec/m)
 DTS = shear sonic travel time (usec/m)
 Kb = compressional bulk modulus of empty rock frame (GPa)
 Kc = compressional bulk modulus of porous rock (GPa)
 Kf = compressional bulk modulus of fluid in the pores (GPa)
 Km = compressional bulk modulus of rock grains (GPa)
 Kp = compressional bulk modulus of pore space (GPa)
 N = shear modulus of empty rock frame (GPa)
 PHIt = total porosity of the rock (fractional)
 Sw = water saturation (fractional)
 Vp = compressional wave velocity (m/sec)
 Vs = shear wave velocity (m/sec)
 Vp = Stoneley wave velocity (m/sec)
 KS4 = 1000 for semi-Metric units shown above - convert kg/m3 to
			g/cc
 The
			Biot-Gassmann approach looks deceptively simple. However, the major
			drawback to this approach is the difficulty in determining the bulk
			moduli, particularly those of the empty rock frame (Kb and N), which
			cannot be derived from log data. Murphy (1991) provided equations
			for sandstone rocks (PHIe < 0.35) that predict Kb and N from
			porosity:8: Kb = 38.18 * (1 -
			3.39 * PHIe + 1.95 * PHIe^2)
 9: N   = 42.65 * (1 -
			3.48 * PHIe + 2.19 * PHIe^2)
 
				
					
						| 
						
						RECOMMENDED PARAMETERS: |  
						| 
						Water | 
						
						Salinity      | 
						
						Cf psi-1 | 
						
						Kf psi | 
						
						Cf GPa-1 | 
						
						 Kf GPa |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						5000 | 
						
						 0.0000040 | 
						
						 250000 | 
						
						 0.580 | 
						
						 1.723 |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						35000 | 
						
						 0.0000039 | 
						
						 270270 | 
						
						 0.537 | 
						
						 1.862 |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						200000 | 
						
						 0.0000027 | 
						
						 344828 | 
						
						 0.420 | 
						
						 2.376 |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						  | 
						
						  | 
						
						  | 
						
						  | 
						
						  |  
						| 
						Oil | 
						
						Depth     | 
						
						  | 
						
						  | 
						
						  | 
						
						  |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						 2000 ft 610 m | 
						
						 0.0000085 | 
						
						 117647 | 
						
						 1.233 | 
						
						 0.811 |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						 4000 ft 1220 m | 
						
						 0.0000095 | 
						
						 105263 | 
						
						 1.378 | 
						
						 0.725 |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						 8000 ft 2440 m | 
						
						 0.0000116 | 
						
						 86207 | 
						
						 1.683 | 
						
						 0.594 |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						 12000 ft 3660 m | 
						
						 0.0000135 | 
						
						 74074 | 
						
						 1.959 | 
						
						 0.510 |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						  | 
						
						  | 
						
						  | 
						
						  | 
						
						  |  
						| 
						Gas | 
						
						Depth     | 
						
						  | 
						
						  | 
						
						  | 
						
						  |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						 2000 ft 610 m | 
						
						 0.001250 | 
						
						 800 | 
						
						 181.422 | 
						
						 0.006 |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						 4000 ft 1220 m | 
						
						 0.000510 | 
						
						 1961 | 
						
						 74.020 | 
						
						 0.014 |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						 8000 ft 2440 m | 
						
						 0.000180 | 
						
						 5556 | 
						
						 26.124 | 
						
						 0.038 |  
						| 
						
						  | 
						
						 12000 ft 3660 m | 
						
						 0.000100 | 
						
						 10000 | 
						
						 14.513 | 
						
						 0.069 |      
			 Examples of Mechanical Properties Logs The format and curve complement of Mechanical Properties Logs vary widely between service
                companies and age of log. Some logs have Metric depths but the moduli are in English units. Some are vice versa. Here are some
                examples.
 
			
			 
  Example of log reconstruction in a shaly sand sequence (Dunvegan).
			The 3 tracks on the left show the measured gamma ray, caliper,
			density, and compressional sonic. Original density and sonic are
			shown in black, modeled logs are in colour. Shear sonic is the model
			result as none was recorded in this well. Computed elastic
			properties are shown in the right hand tracks. Results from the
			original unedited curves are shown in black, those after log editing
			are in colour. Note that the small differences in the modeled logs
			compared to the original curves propagate into larger differences in
			the results, especially Poisson's Ratio (PR), Young's Modulus (ED),
			and total closure stress (TCS).
 
 
				 Mechanical properties log with lithology/porosity track at
				the right. This analysis was run to find out if sanding might
				occur during production from the oil zone. High bulk modulus and
				low sher modulus suggest sanding is like. Stress failre (shaded
				black in Track 1) shows where sanding is most likely to occur.
 
 |