| 
 GAMMA RAY BASICS Gamma ray logs are recorded in virtually every oil
			and gas well drilled, and on most logs run in mineral exploration
			prospects. In sedimentary rocks, shales are often more radioactive
			than reservoir rocks such as sandstone, limestone, and dolomite
			(although there are exceptions). The shape of the gamma ray log with
			respect to depth assists in correlating layers from one well to
			another, and for assessing depositional environment.
 Of the 117 elements, 83 have more than one form,
  or isotope. Isotopes are inherently unstable and, over time, decay to the lower
  energy, stable form. The half life of an isotope may be millions of years,
  days, or even milliseconds.
 The most common isotopes are the uranium series, the thorium series, and potassium,
  which has only one unstable isotope. These elements are found in nature, and amongst
  other things, emit natural gamma rays that can be detected by a logging tool
  in a borehole.
 
 Each of the above elements naturally emits
                gamma rays which are distinctive in both number and energy. One
                gram of potassium 40 emits an average of 3.4 photons per second
                at a fixed 1.46 MeV energy. But an equal weight of either thorium
                or uranium produces respectively 12,000 or 26,000 gamma rays
                per second with a spectrum of energies that average 0.5 MeV.
 
 In the logging industry, gamma ray flux has been recorded in
			micrograms Radium equivalent per ton (ug Ra equiv / ton) prior to
			about 1960. After that time, logs were calibrated in API units based
			on known radiation levels of artificial formations in test pits
			located in Houston. The usual scale for old style logs was 0 to 10
			ug Ra and 0 to 100, 0 to 120, or 0 to 150 API units for newer logs.
			There is an exact conversion between ug Ra and API units but since
			the old logging tools were rarely calibrated, this conversion is
			seldom useful. The pragmatic solution is to multiply ug Ra by 10 to
			obtain an approximate API units scale.
 The counting rate at the detector in a gamma ray logging tool is naturally
  influenced by the tool itself and the borehole environment. However, the primary
  response will be related to the number of atoms per unit mass emitting gamma
  rays. Therefore, the effective gamma ray response due to
                  potassium 40, for a single compound is:1: GRk = 6.02*10^23 * Nk * C / M
 Where:C = 0.000118 (relative abundance of K40 to K39)
 GRk = number of gamma ray emissions
 M = molecular weight of the rock
 Nk = number of potassium atoms per gram
 For a mixture:2:
  GRk = Sum (Wi * GRki)
 Where:GRki = gamma ray contribution of ith component
 Wi = weight fraction of the ith component
 An empirical relationship between effective potassium
                  content and gamma ray API units is reproduced  below
                  for the standard gamma ray logging conditions of 8" borehole,
                  10 lb/gal mud and 3 5/8" scintillation NaI detector type
                  tool typical of the 1960 - 1980 era. Newer tools are more
				sensitive and more linear. This relationship was originally developed by the author
                  while calibrating gamma ray log response to potash ore content
                  of sylvite beds in 1963. For other borehole environments refer
                  to appropriate borehole correction charts. 
				 Some
                  tools are more linear than this one. The flattening effect
                  at high count rates is due to the dead time of the detector
                  system. Dead time is the time it takes to measure and transmit the recorded
                  pulse to the surface. For other tool types, with different
                  detectors and dead times, the relationship must be found by
                  calibration. 
 
 
			
			
			
				
				 GAMMA RAY DETECTORS Four basic types of gamma ray detectors have been used since the inception
    of radiation logging. These are ionization chambers, Geiger-Mueller detectors, proportional
    counters, and scintillation detectors. Although proportional counters are
    presently used only in neutron logging, the remaining three types have been
    commonly used to make either gamma ray or neutron measurements.
 
				The first
    three types operate on the general principle of gas ionization caused by
    incident gamma rays. Most middle aged and modern tools use scintillation
			counters composed of sodium iodide (NaI) crystals. These emit a tiny
			flash of light when struck by a gamma ray. The flash of light is
			amplified by a photo-multiplier tube, which in turn generates an
			electrical pulse. The pulses are counted by appropriate electronics
			to provide the gamma ray count rate recorded on the log.
 Scintillation detectors are more
                efficient than gas detectors because they contain a greater mass
                of radiation sensitive material. Also, their relatively small
                size enables them to resolve thin beds much more accurately.
                Scintillation detectors provide adequate resolution in formations
                as little as three feet thick.
 
			
  GAMMA RAY SPECTRAL LOG In gamma ray spectral logging, the three 
			main gamma ray contributors, potassium (K), thorium (TH), and uranium (U), give gamma rays of different energy levels. By appropriate
      filtering, the total gamma ray flux can be separated into the three components.
 
 This aids petrophysical analysis as thorium is a good shale indicator when uranium
      masks the total GR response. Thorium-potassium ratio and other combinations
      of curves can be used for mineral identification and clay typing. Finally,
      uranium counts can be subtracted from the total counts to give a uranium
      corrected gamma ray curve that is easier to use and to correlate from well
      to well.
 
 Log scales may vary but uranium and thorium are usually scalle in
			parts per million (ppm) and potassium in percent. Curve names may
			also vary but POTA, URAN, and THOR are common.
 
 Although total gamma ray is also presented on the log in API units,
			it is sometimes useful to recalculate the total GR from the
			elemental GR breakdown:
 
 1: GRtotal = 4 * THOR + 8 * URAN + 16
			* POTA
 
 Where:  URAN and THOR are ppm and POTA is in %. GRtotal is in
			API units.
 
			If uranium is known in ppm, total gamma ray can be corrected for
			uranium with:2: CGR = GRtotal - 8 * URAN
 
 This makes it easier to use the GR as a shale indicator, especially
			in unconventional (gsa shale) reservoirs.
 
                
  Spectral breakdown of total GR into five energy windows, leading
				to the segregation
 of total counts into three major components - potassium,
				thorium, and uranium.
 Gamma rays emitted by the formation rarely
                    reach the detector directly. Instead, they are scattered
  and lose energy through three possible interactions with the rocks;
                    the photoelectric effect, Compton scattering, and pair production.
                    Because of these interactions and the response of the sodium
                    iodide scintillation detector, the spectra are degraded to
    the rather “smeared” spectra shown above.
  The high-energy part of the detected
                  spectrum is divided into three energy windows, W1, W2, and
                  W3; each covering a characteristic peak of the three radioactivity
                  series. Knowing the response of the tool and the number of
                  counts in each window, it is possible to determine the amounts
                  of thorium 232, uranium 238, and potassium 40 in the formation.
                  There are relatively few counts in the high-energy range where
                  peak discrimination is best; therefore, measurements are subject
                  to large statistical variations, even at low logging speeds.  
				By including a contribution from the high-count rate, low-energy part of
    the spectrum (Windows W4 and W5), these high statistical variations in the
    high-energy windows can be reduced by a factor of 1.5 to 2. The statistics
    are further reduced by another factor of 1.5 to 2 by using a filtering technique
    that compares the counts at a particular depth with the previous values in
    such a way that spurious changes are eliminated while the effects of formation
    changes are retained. 
 |