| 
					 CROSSPLOTS FOR CLAY TYPING 
			Clay
			typing from well log data is usually accomplished by using
			crossplots of  potassium and thorium data from the gamma ray
			spectral log and the photo electric effect. If the shale is somewhat
			silty, the non-clay minerals will skew the results, requiring a
			detailed multi-mineral model calculation. Density, neutron, and PE
			data will also help sort out clay types.   
              
                
                  | Th/K Ratio |  
                  | 
					
					High | 
					
					Kaolinite |  
                  |  | 
					Chlorite |  
                  |  | 
					Montemorillonite |  
                  |  | 
					Illite |  
                  |  | 
					Mica |  
                  |  | 
					Glauconite |  
                  |  | 
					Feldspar |  
                  | 
					
					Low | 
					Potassium
                    evaporate |  
			
			  THORIUM / POTASSIUM CROSSPLOTS The
                thorium/potassium ratio method of visually identifying
                clay-type can be used with the aid of the table at the right, or
			with the calculator shown below..
 
 Thorium is recorded in parts per
			million (ppm) and potassium in percent (%), and the Th/K ratio is
			therefore in units of (Th-ppm) / (K-%). For example if THOR = 9 ppm
			and POTA = 3.0%, the ratio is 9 / 3 = 3.0. This is in the mid-range
			of these ratios and the interpretation could be illite clay or mica
			or both in this
 
			 shale.           
			This
                ratio is illustrated graphically below.  
				 PE vs Th/K Ratio Crossplot for Clay Typing. Thorium is
				recorded in ppm and Potassium in % by
 volume, so units on X axis are ppm / %. The PE value helps
				distinguish between minerals with similar Th/K ratios. Note that
				clay and mica minerals do not hve unique values but ranges of
				values for Th/K and some have a wide rangee for PE as well.
 
			
			 PE / POTASSIUM CROSSPLOTS This crossplot distributes the clay minerals in the X-Y space
				somewhat differentky than the PE vs Th/K crossplot. It may give
				better resolution in some mineral combinations. Two and three
				mineral models can be developed for various mineral mixtures.
 
				 PE vs Potassium Crossplot for  Clay Typing. If data
				points fall to the left of the clay points, the
 data is from a silty shale or calcareous shale. Units on X axis are
				Potassium % by volume.
    Ush - Apparent Matrix Photoelectric Cross Section of
			Shale The matrix
			density (DFNSma) versus matrix cross section (Uma) crossplot is
			usually used to solve a 3-mineral model, but it can be used for clay
			typing by plotting data from shale intervals. If data is in porosity
			units, convert PHIDSH to density with equation 2. Calculate Ush from
			equation 3. Plot DENSSH on vertical axis and Ush on horizontal axis.
 
 1: PHIt = (PHINSH + PHIDSH) / 2
 2: DENSSH =  PHIDSH * KD1+ (1 - PHIDSH) *
			KD2
 3: USH = PESH * DENSSH / PHIt
 Where:KD1 = 1.00,  KD2 = 2.65 for Sandstone scale or 2.71
				for Limestone scale
 DENSSH = density log reading in shale (gm/cc)
 PESH = effective photoelectric cross section in shale (barns/cm3)
 PHINSH = neutron porosity in shale (fractional)
 PHIDSH = density porosity in shale (fractional)
 PHINSH = neutron porosity in shale (fractional)
 USH = photoelectric absorption of shale (barns/cm3)
 
			
			 Matrix Density vs Matrix Cross Section Crossplot
                for Lithology. If plotted data points fall
 above the clay points, the data is from a silty shale or a
			calcareous shale.
 
 |